Stanley McCrystal was successful because he was able to take
advice from people who worked under him who had more knowledge of the technologies
he had to use. One source states “Revealing you are human is helpful; good
leaders go and find the answers the team needs” (Brandon , 2014). I think Stanley lives that each day. He understood what
it took to be successful; sometimes he doesn’t have all the answers and he
needs to outsource the information gathering to someone more qualified. Often
times leader are not successful because the do the opposite of that. They think
they have all the answers and they implement things that are not successful
like that of Napelli from our discussion about Home Depot. A classmate
(Phillip), said it best in his discussion observing that “The negatives were apparent at Home Depot during his
tenure due to index score fell from 75 to 67 while rival Lowes remained at 75”
(Boylyard, 2015). In our discussion this
week, it was obvious that the new CEO has made a number of huge errors that, in
hindsight, must not make a lot of sense to Napelli.
I think that there is a lot to learn from these two leaders.
Each one of them admitted that they needed to look at the way they are doing business
and reevaluate that technique in order to be more successful in the future. Stanley had a lot thrown
at him in a short amount of time and was able to use his tools to his
advantage. Jim knew that in order to keeps his business going, he would have to
look outside the box and understand new management techniques. Those techniques
are making him more profitable and successful now.
Brandon, J. (2014, August
29). 20 Ways to Become a Better Leader Right Now. Retrieved May 3, 2015, from http://www.inc.com/john-brandon/20-ways-to-become-a-better-leader-right-now.html
Brown, D. (2011). An Experimental Approach to Organizational
Development (8th ed.). Saddle River , NJ :
Pearson Education.
Boylyard, P. (2015, January
1). Class Discussion [Online].
No comments:
Post a Comment